<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quantum Leap Forward</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ignisfatuus.com/2008/08/08/quantum-leap-forward/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ignisfatuus.com/2008/08/08/quantum-leap-forward/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:36:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.ignisfatuus.com/2008/08/08/quantum-leap-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ignisfatuus.com/?p=323#comment-261</guid>
		<description>No worries... Schrödinger&#039;s Equation/Wave Model and the Uncertainty Principle are inextricably linked.  Regardless, you explained it properly.  I&#039;m a jackass.  

Self-deprecation is the result of the internet being added to a system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No worries&#8230; Schrödinger&#8217;s Equation/Wave Model and the Uncertainty Principle are inextricably linked.  Regardless, you explained it properly.  I&#8217;m a jackass.  </p>
<p>Self-deprecation is the result of the internet being added to a system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.ignisfatuus.com/2008/08/08/quantum-leap-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ignisfatuus.com/?p=323#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Correction made.  Thank you for making me feel like a dumbass. ;)  In my defense, it was 3:30am when I wrote this, and as I was writing I kept thinking about that damn &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger%27s_cat&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cat in the box&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction made.  Thank you for making me feel like a dumbass. <img src='http://www.ignisfatuus.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   In my defense, it was 3:30am when I wrote this, and as I was writing I kept thinking about that damn <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger%27s_cat" rel="nofollow">cat in the box</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.ignisfatuus.com/2008/08/08/quantum-leap-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ignisfatuus.com/?p=323#comment-259</guid>
		<description>Ahem... it&#039;s the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.

;)

It&#039;s one of the few principles of Physics and Chemistry that I recall from high school.  Le Chatelier&#039;s Principle is another good one, but totally irrelevant to this topic.

Anyway, observation and measurement usually affects a system at the atomic or subatomic scale, as energy is necessarily applied to a given system when analysed by instruments capable of measuring said scale.  The &quot;reality&quot; of the particle existing is not compromised, but even electrons can be excited and displaced from their &quot;resting&quot; state by measurement.  Ergo, you could decipher the location of an electron, but you more than likely put it in that location.

This was a really interesting post, Dave.  I too am having difficulty understanding some of the contradictory logic presented by quantum theory and particle behaviour.  Maybe I need to read more into the &quot;partial measuring&quot; methods to understand how the resting and excited states were mitigated.

I&#039;m out of my element.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahem&#8230; it&#8217;s the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.ignisfatuus.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s one of the few principles of Physics and Chemistry that I recall from high school.  Le Chatelier&#8217;s Principle is another good one, but totally irrelevant to this topic.</p>
<p>Anyway, observation and measurement usually affects a system at the atomic or subatomic scale, as energy is necessarily applied to a given system when analysed by instruments capable of measuring said scale.  The &#8220;reality&#8221; of the particle existing is not compromised, but even electrons can be excited and displaced from their &#8220;resting&#8221; state by measurement.  Ergo, you could decipher the location of an electron, but you more than likely put it in that location.</p>
<p>This was a really interesting post, Dave.  I too am having difficulty understanding some of the contradictory logic presented by quantum theory and particle behaviour.  Maybe I need to read more into the &#8220;partial measuring&#8221; methods to understand how the resting and excited states were mitigated.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m out of my element.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.ignisfatuus.com/2008/08/08/quantum-leap-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ignisfatuus.com/?p=323#comment-258</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Travelling_salesman_problem&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt;&#039;s a concrete example of a question that might stump a conventional computer for ... well, forever, if there were enough points of information involved.  This is exactly the type of question a quantum computer could make vastly easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Travelling_salesman_problem" rel="nofollow">Here</a>&#8217;s a concrete example of a question that might stump a conventional computer for &#8230; well, forever, if there were enough points of information involved.  This is exactly the type of question a quantum computer could make vastly easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.ignisfatuus.com/2008/08/08/quantum-leap-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 07:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ignisfatuus.com/?p=323#comment-257</guid>
		<description>*By calculating in a non-linear way, I mean that quantum computers can take advantage of quantum particles&#039; ability to exist in several states and places at once -- to do several calculations at once.  Traditional computers do one calculation after another -- and they can do them really, really quickly, but when you get into things like simulating weather patterns, even a million calculations a second isn&#039;t enough.  Far better to do a million calculations in an instant (which isn&#039;t really a scientific measurement of time, but anyway, it&#039;s really short).

One of my favourite analogies to describe how quantum computers perform multiple calculations simultaneously is this: imagine (again) that you&#039;re looking for a dog in a house with 100 rooms.  If you were a normal computer, you&#039;d go from room to room and check them all, and maybe you&#039;d strike the correct room right away, but maybe you&#039;d have to check 99 empty rooms first.  If you&#039;re a quantum particle forming a single bit of a quantum computer, though, and you can exist in several places at once, you could simultaneously visit all 100 rooms at once.  Then, you simply report back to home base: &quot;The dog is in room 53.&quot;  And that&#039;s just a single bit -- networking these bits into a processor could conceivably make computers capable of quickly solving problems that would take years for a conventional computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*By calculating in a non-linear way, I mean that quantum computers can take advantage of quantum particles&#8217; ability to exist in several states and places at once &#8212; to do several calculations at once.  Traditional computers do one calculation after another &#8212; and they can do them really, really quickly, but when you get into things like simulating weather patterns, even a million calculations a second isn&#8217;t enough.  Far better to do a million calculations in an instant (which isn&#8217;t really a scientific measurement of time, but anyway, it&#8217;s really short).</p>
<p>One of my favourite analogies to describe how quantum computers perform multiple calculations simultaneously is this: imagine (again) that you&#8217;re looking for a dog in a house with 100 rooms.  If you were a normal computer, you&#8217;d go from room to room and check them all, and maybe you&#8217;d strike the correct room right away, but maybe you&#8217;d have to check 99 empty rooms first.  If you&#8217;re a quantum particle forming a single bit of a quantum computer, though, and you can exist in several places at once, you could simultaneously visit all 100 rooms at once.  Then, you simply report back to home base: &#8220;The dog is in room 53.&#8221;  And that&#8217;s just a single bit &#8212; networking these bits into a processor could conceivably make computers capable of quickly solving problems that would take years for a conventional computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
